THREAD: depp vs heard ends verdict

STUDENT’S Shocking 39-Year Sentence in Beach Murder Sparks Outrage

28 March 2025 — A student received a 39-year prison sentence for murdering a woman at the beach. Court evidence showed his deep anger towards women. This crime has stunned the local community, raising concerns about violence against women.

The judge called the attack planned and extremely violent. Prosecutors highlighted the student’s past misogynistic behavior as proof of his motives. This case highlights larger societal issues of misogyny and gender-based violence.

Public outrage has grown, with demands for better support systems and preventive steps to fight violence against women. Discussions are focusing on tackling societal issues that lead to such crimes.

Women’s rights advocates are urging educational campaigns on gender-based violence and consent after the sentencing. They stress the importance of public awareness to stop future incidents like this one.

KOHBERGER Trial DRAMA: Defense Fights to Limit "Murder" Talk

10 March 2025 — As Bryan Kohberger’s trial approaches, legal battles heat up over language and evidence. The defense wants to limit words like “murder,” “psychopath,” and even mentions of “bushy eyebrows.” They argue that crime scene photos should be restricted because they might sway the jury emotionally.

Prosecutors respond by asking the defense not to label the state’s death penalty pursuit as an “attempt to kill” Kohberger. A major motion from Kohberger’s team seeks to drop the death penalty, citing delays in evidence sharing by prosecutors.

Unsealed documents from an Ada County judge reveal these filings, with a warning that future sealed submissions must have legal justification. Shanon Gray, representing a victim’s family, criticized poor communication between authorities and his clients but stayed silent on the filings due to a gag order.

DIDDY’S Legal Battle: Feds’ Search Warrants Under Fire

24 February 2025 — Sean “Diddy” Combs’ legal team is fighting back against federal search warrants. They filed motions to suppress evidence obtained during raids on his homes and internet history. The defense argues that the government included “false statements” in their warrant applications.

The motion claims the evidence includes Diddy’s handwritten notes protected by attorney-client privilege. This legal move follows the resignation of his attorney, Anthony Ricco, who cited professional and ethical reasons for stepping down. Diddy’s team is urgently challenging the legality of these searches to protect privileged information.

CITY TAKES ACTION Against SOUTH PHILLY GANG VIOLENCE

Authorities in South Philadelphia have arrested 12 individuals linked to a violent street gang. This group has been responsible for shootings and carjackings, victimizing dozens in the community. Officials aim to dismantle the gang’s operations as part of a broader effort to enhance public safety amid rising crime rates.

CENTRAL NY MAN FACES GRAVE CHILD ABUSE CHARGES

A man in Central New York faces multiple charges for sexually abusing a child under 11 years old over several incidents from 2018 to 2019. Authorities stress the importance of child safety as they pursue serious legal action against him. This case underscores ongoing concerns about child abuse and community vigilance needed to protect vulnerable populations.

TRUMP FIGHTS Back: Legal Showdown Over Policies Ignites Debate

13 February 2025 — Justice Sonia Sotomayor affirmed that court decisions “stand,” addressing concerns about President TRUMP’s acceptance of legal rulings. Liberals worry about potential defiance from the administration.

President Trump, with Elon Musk’s backing, aims to cut federal employees quickly but faces legal obstacles. The administration challenges rules that protect executive branch officials from layoffs.

Major corporate law firms have united against Trump policies, focusing on immigration and transgender rights issues. At least eight top firms represent plaintiffs in these legal battles.

The Justice Department has accused New York of favoring illegal immigrants over citizens, targeting the state’s “green light” law for driver’s licenses for undocumented individuals. Pam Bondi announced a lawsuit excluding New York City and Mayor Adams but focusing on state-level policies.

KILLEEN MURDER Trial Shock: Unexpected Halt Leaves Community on Edge

12 February 2025 — The Killeen murder trial of a former soldier accused of killing his ex-girlfriend has come to an unexpected stop. Judge Wade Faulkner told the jury that a “legal issue” needs the appellate court’s attention before moving forward with closing arguments and jury deliberation. The details and timeline for resolving this matter are unknown, leaving the community in suspense.

FAMILIES STRUGGLE: Financial BURDEN on Violent Crime Victims’ Loved Ones

A recent report highlights the financial struggles faced by families of violent crime victims. They often deal with funeral and legal costs without enough reimbursement. Victim Support is urging quick reforms to speed up damage awards and increase contributions from compensation funds, easing these burdens during already tough times.

LUIGI MANGIONE’S DEFENSE FUNDED: $300K RAISED for High-Profile Murder Case

Luigi Mangione, accused of murdering UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson, has received nearly $300,000 in donations for his legal defense through GiveSendGo. This funding shows public interest in the case and concerns over private health insurance industry issues as Mangione’s trial nears in New York court later this month.

MYSTERY SOLVED: HUMAN REMAINS Found by Hiker IDENTIFIED in North Carolina

ARIZONA ELECTORS Celebrate Legal Triumph

11 February 2025 — Arizona’s so-called fake electors scored a major legal win in their fight to dismiss a criminal case against them. The case, led by Democratic Attorney General Kris Mayes, was challenged under an Arizona law that prevents politically motivated prosecutions. The electors argued the prosecution violated Arizona’s anti-SLAPP law, claiming it aimed to retaliate against their constitutional rights.

CRYPTO HACKS SURGE AS ILLEGAL DEALS FALL

The TRM Labs 2025 Crypto Crime Report shows a drop in illegal crypto transactions but a rise in hacks and misuse by bad actors. This trend underscores ongoing security worries in the crypto world. Legal experts are advised to stay alert as these cyber threats continue to change and grow.

WOMAN CHARGED WITH CHILD ENDANGERMENT IN OXFORD

An Oxford woman is charged with leaving three kids alone in a car while she drank nearby. Raleigh police found the children safe after responding around 12:45 a.m. This incident raises serious questions about child safety and potential legal consequences for negligence.

Ocean City Elementary School went into lockdown due to an unspecified threat, which was later deemed unverified, allowing normal activities to resume safely for students and staff alike.

TRUMP’S Bold Move: Legal Battle Over Birthright Citizenship Sparks Intense Debate

05 February 2025 — A federal judge will soon hear a lawsuit challenging former President Donald Trump’s order to end birthright citizenship. This legal fight heats up the ongoing debate over U.S. immigration policy. The case questions if it’s constitutional to change the 14th Amendment’s promise of citizenship for those born on American soil.

Civil rights groups and state attorneys general argue Trump’s order undermines basic rights and contradicts established law. They say it could scare immigrant communities, affecting millions born in the U.S. to non-citizen parents. Meanwhile, Trump officials defend the order as crucial for stopping illegal immigration and protecting national security.

The outcome may greatly affect both immigration law and upcoming elections, with candidates likely taking sides on this hot issue. As arguments unfold, a ruling could either stop or push forward Trump’s order, further igniting political tensions in 2025.

SCOTUS DECISION Rocks TikTok: What It Means for America

18 January 2025 — The U.S. Supreme Court has upheld the TikTok divest-or-ban law, dismissing claims of First Amendment violations. This decision requires ByteDance to sell its U.S. stake in TikTok by January 19 or face a nationwide ban. The ruling could change the social media landscape and has ignited debates on national security and data privacy concerns.

Legal experts are now exploring how this decision will affect freedom of expression for users. The ruling raises questions about balancing national security with constitutional rights, a topic that remains contentious among stakeholders.

Concerns are growing over how this could impact American users and businesses that rely on TikTok for communication and marketing purposes. As discussions continue, many eagerly await ByteDance’s next move in response to this landmark Supreme Court decision.

GREENPEACE Activists CLEARED: Judge Slams Charges in Sunak Protest

22 September 2024 — Four Greenpeace activists were arrested for scaling former U.K. Prime Minister Rishi Sunak’s estate and draping it in black fabric. They protested his plan to expand oil and gas drilling in the North Sea. Judge Adrian Lower dismissed the charges, citing insufficient evidence of criminal damage to Sunak’s slate roof.

One defendant, Michael Grant, praised the court’s decision but criticized the broader trend of jailing peaceful protesters. He stated, “We have become a country that regularly sends peaceful protesters to jail.” This sentiment echoes concerns about harsh penalties faced by other environmental activists in the U.K.

In contrast, five activists who blocked traffic on a major London highway received sentences of up to five years in prison for their actions last November. The disparity highlights ongoing debates over how to handle environmental protests legally and ethically.

JUDGE BLOCKS Public Release of Nashville Shooter’s Writings

05 July 2024 — A judge in Nashville ruled that the writings of Audrey Hale, who killed six people at a Christian school, cannot be released to the public. Judge I’Ashea Myles determined that the victims’ families hold the copyright to Hale’s works. The families argued they should control access to these materials.

The decision stems from a novel legal argument using federal Copyright Act exceptions. Hale’s parents transferred ownership of her property to the victims’ families, who then fought in court for this ruling. This case marks a unique interpretation of copyright law as it applies to public records.

Interest in these documents is high due to theories about Hale’s motives, including possible hate crimes against Christians. Police reported that Hale may have identified as transgender, adding another layer of controversy and speculation around her writings.

Victims’ families praised the ruling, stating it denies notoriety to the shooter and brings them some relief. Cindy Peak’s family expressed gratitude for preventing Hale’s “vile and unfiltered thoughts” from being released publicly. The case is expected to be appealed soon.

TRUMP FIGHTS Back: Lawyers Demand End to GAG Order in New York Case

05 June 2024 — Donald Trump’s legal team is requesting the removal of a gag order that prevents him from commenting on witnesses, jurors, and others involved in his criminal case. His lawyers argue that the restrictions on Trump’s First Amendment rights are no longer justified now that the trial has concluded.

Trump’s attorneys, Todd Blanche and Emil Bove, emphasized the need for “unrestrained campaign advocacy,” especially after President Joe Biden’s public comments about the verdict. They also pointed out ongoing criticism from Michael Cohen and Stormy Daniels as reasons to lift the gag order.

The Manhattan district attorney’s office declined to comment on this request. Judge Juan M. Merchan initially issued the gag order before the trial started due to concerns about Trump attacking those involved in his cases.

Merchan later expanded it to include comments about his own family after Trump targeted his daughter online. While remarks about Merchan and District Attorney Alvin Bragg are permitted, statements regarding court staff and Bragg’s prosecution team remain prohibited under the current gag order.

OJ Simpson’s TWISTED Fate: From Freedom to Prison

13 April 2024 — More than two decades after O.J. Simpson walked free in a murder case that grabbed headlines worldwide, a Nevada jury found him guilty of armed robbery and kidnapping. The conviction was for trying to take back personal items in Las Vegas. Some say the tough 33-year sentence at 61 years old was because of his earlier trial and his fame.

The trial in Los Angeles, coming after the Rodney King incident, ended with Simpson not guilty. But many think this result made his punishment for the Las Vegas crimes harsher later on. “Celebrity justice swings both ways,” said media lawyer Royal Oakes, pointing out how Simpson’s star status affected his legal troubles.

Released on parole in 2017 after nine years behind bars, Simpson’s journey is much different from his first trial’s verdict. His cases have started talks about how fame can tilt the scales of justice and possible jury bias due to race. These events show the tricky mix of fame, societal issues, and law in America.

Simpson’s story continues to be a powerful example of how celebrity can impact legal outcomes differently over time, raising questions about fairness and justice in high-profile cases.

BRITISH TRADER’S Appeal Crushed: Libor Conviction Stands Strong

28 March 2024 — Tom Hayes, a former financial trader for Citigroup and UBS, has been unsuccessful in his attempt to overturn his conviction. This 44-year-old Brit was convicted in 2015 for manipulating the London Inter-Bank Offered Rate (LIBOR) from 2006 to 2010. His case marked the first-ever conviction of this kind.

Hayes served half of an 11-year sentence and was released in 2021. Despite asserting his innocence throughout, he faced another conviction by a U.S court in 2016.

Carlo Palombo, another trader implicated in similar manipulations with Euribor, also sought appeal through the U.K.'s Court of Appeal via the Criminal Cases Review Commission. However, after a three-day hearing earlier this month, both appeals were dismissed without success.

The Serious Fraud Office remained resolute against these appeals stating: “No one is above the law and the court has recognized that these convictions stand firm.” This decision comes on the heels of a contrasting verdict from a U.S court last year which reversed similar convictions of two former Deutsche Bank traders.

JUDGEMENT HOUR: Assange’s Future Teeters as UK Judges Decide on US Extradition

26 March 2024 — Today, two esteemed judges from the British High Court will determine the destiny of Julian Assange, the founder of Wikileaks. The verdict, slated for 10:30 a.m. GMT (6:30 a.m. ET), will decide if Assange can contest his extradition to the U.S.

At age 52, Assange is up against espionage charges in America for disclosing classified military documents over ten years ago. Despite this, he has not yet faced trial in an American court due to his escape from the country.

This decision comes on the heels of last month’s two-day hearing which might have been Assange’s final bid to thwart his extradition. If denied a comprehensive appeal by the High Court, Assange could make one last plea before the European Court of Human Rights.

Supporters of Assange are apprehensive that an unfavorable ruling could expedite his extradition. His spouse Stella underscored this critical juncture with her message yesterday stating “This is it. DECISION TOMORROW.”

CRUMBLEY VERDICT: Parents Face Historic Accountability for Child’s Deadly Actions

15 March 2024 — In a landmark decision, a Michigan jury found James Crumbley guilty of four counts of involuntary manslaughter. This verdict stems from the fatal shooting carried out by his son, Ethan Crumbley, at Oxford High School in November 2021. The case marks an unprecedented moment in which parents are held liable for their child’s violent behavior.

James and Jennifer Crumbley faced charges after their 15-year-old son tragically ended the lives of four students and wounded seven others. Keith Johnson, a criminal defense attorney, suggests that this case could establish a new standard for parental accountability when weapons brought into homes result in mass shootings.

The Crumbleys have made history as the first parents to be tried in relation to a mass school shooting incident in the U.S. James was indicted for failing to properly secure his firearm at home and neglecting his son’s mental health concerns.

In line with his wife’s earlier decision during her separate trial in February, James elected not to testify during his trial. Jennifer was also found guilty on all charges and is set to receive her sentence next month.

IDAHO Supreme Court REJECTS Appeal in Shocking Student Murder Case

13 March 2024 — The Idaho Supreme Court dismissed the pretrial appeal of Bryan Kohberger on Tuesday. Kohberger’s public defenders had argued that his indictment on four counts of first-degree murder and one count of burglary was improperly handled by prosecutors.

The grand jury was guided to indict if they found guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, which is a more stringent criterion than probable cause. The reasoning behind the Idaho Supreme Court’s dismissal of the appeal was not disclosed.

Kohberger, a 29-year-old Ph.D. student hailing from Pennsylvania, stands accused of committing an unspeakable crime in Moscow, Idaho. He allegedly infiltrated an off-campus residence and brutally murdered four University of Idaho students in November 2022. His bid to stall proceedings by challenging the judge’s refusal to discard the indictment proved futile

As Kohberger awaits trial for his purported heinous acts, this case continues to evolve. This latest ruling signifies another stride towards justice for the victims.

DEFEAT for Disney: Court TOSSES Lawsuit Against Governor DeSantis

01 February 2024 — On Wednesday, a significant legal victory was scored by Governor DeSantis and his administration. The court dismissed a lawsuit brought by Disney, asserting that the entertainment giant lacked the necessary standing to sue.

The basis for dismissal centered on Disney’s inability to demonstrate any imminent harm or injury directly linked to actions taken by either the Secretary or governor.

While the court acknowledged that Disney could potentially bring a case against members of the Central Florida Tourism Oversight District (CTFOD), it was determined that even then, they would not prevail.

The case in question, Walt Disney Parks & Resorts v. DeSantis (No. 4:23-cv-163), took place in the U.S. District Court for Northern Florida.

CHICAGO HEARTBREAK: 26-Year Sentence for Daughter’s Brutal Murder of Mother in Bali

18 January 2024 — Chicago native Heather Mack, who conspired with her boyfriend to murder her mother in Bali, has been sentenced to 26 years in federal prison. The crime involved leaving the victim’s body in a suitcase. Mack had already served seven years for the same crime in Indonesia before being deported back to the U.S. She pleaded guilty to conspiracy charges related to this heinous act.

Mack’s legal team had hoped for a sentence no longer than 15 years, taking into account her time served overseas. However, prosecutors sought a harsher punishment of 28 years. Ultimately, on Wednesday, the federal judge decided on a sentence of 26 years.

The chilling murder was masterminded through text messages between Mack and her boyfriend, Tommy Schaefer. They targeted Sheila von Wiese during their holiday at the St. Regis hotel in Bali back in 2014. In a shocking turn of events, Schaefer bludgeoned Wiese with a fruit bowl handle while Mack silenced her screams.

EXTREME Hate Speech: Neo-Nazi Podcasters PAY the Price for Threats Against Prince Harry and Family

04 January 2024 — In a recent ruling, a London court has handed down sentences to two neo-Nazi podcasters. The charges? Inciting violence against Prince Harry and his young son. The culprits, Christopher Gibbons and Tyrone Patten-Walsh, are the hosts of “Lone Wolf Radio”. According to the sentencing judge, these men are “dedicated and unapologetic white supremacists”.

Gibbons, aged 40, was dealt an eight-year prison sentence. His co-host Patten-Walsh, 34 years old, received seven years behind bars. Following their prison terms, both men will be under probation for three years. Their podcast was a platform for spreading racist views along with antisemitic, Islamophobic, homophobic and misogynistic ideologies.

The duo didn’t just stop at propagating hate speech; they encouraged violent acts against ethnic minorities as well as individuals in interracial relationships whom they labeled as “race traitors”. Prince Harry’s wife Meghan Markle happens to be biracial. In one shocking episode of their show Gibbons even suggested that Prince Harry should face prosecution for treason while his son Archie was dehumanized as a “creature” that should be euthanized.

PRINCE HARRY’S Libel Case Crumbles: Judge Dismisses Royal’s Claims

08 December 2023 — A London-based judge, Justice Matthew Nicklin, recently dealt a blow to Prince Harry in his libel case against Associated Newspaper Ltd. The Duke of Sussex was unsuccessful in tearing down the defense’s claim that their article was merely an honest opinion.

This ruling follows another legal skirmish involving Harry. The crux of this battle is whether the government unjustly removed his security detail after he moved to the U.S in 2020. The prince contends that social media hostility and relentless media attention pose threats to him and his wife.

The Mail on Sunday and Mail Online ran an article about Harry’s legal tussle with the government over police bodyguards. Harry claims this piece was fundamentally flawed and slanderous, insinuating he fabricated details about his case against the government. Nevertheless, Associated Newspapers argued that their article was simply voicing an honest opinion without inflicting significant damage to Harry’s reputation.