THREAD: other trump lawsuits

GOP House FIGHTS Back Against Judges Blocking Trump

24 March 2025 — The GOP-led House is planning hearings on judges who have blocked President Trump’s actions. This is part of a larger effort to support Trump’s agenda and tackle legal challenges. Republicans want to examine judicial decisions that have stalled the administration’s policies.

In Wisconsin, Elon Musk and Donald Trump are stepping up their involvement in the state’s Supreme Court race. The result could greatly affect abortion laws and districting, benefiting Republican goals. Schimel needs to rally Trump supporters for this key election.

President Trump is pushing ahead with his immigration crackdown and federal overhaul despite backlash from both parties. His administration has cut thousands of federal jobs, drawing criticism at town halls across the country. Still, Trump is determined to advance his policy goals amid ongoing legal fights.

TRUMP’S GOLD Card Plan: Economic Boost or Risky Gamble?

20 March 2025 — During a chat with Laura Ingraham, former President Donald Trump tackled worries about his gold card plan. He assured that any unsavory individuals would be screened and removed if needed. Trump stressed that those found unfit would get refunds and be sent out of the country.

Trump pointed out the economic perks of the plan, noting that people who can pay the $5 million fee are likely to create jobs. He believes these immigrants will boost the economy by generating jobs and encouraging business growth.

Trump also mentioned that companies might buy these gold cards to hire top graduates from America’s best schools. This strategy aims to attract skilled professionals who can drive innovation and competitiveness in various fields.

TRUMP vs Mills: FIERY Showdown Over Transgender Sports

23 February 2025 — President Donald TRUMP and Democratic Governor Janet Mills had a heated exchange at the White House over transgender women in sports. This meeting showed the growing divide between Republicans and Democrats on this hot-button issue.

The debate mirrors ongoing national talks about fairness and inclusivity in sports. Both sides stand firm, with Republicans stressing fairness for biological women, while Democrats push for transgender rights.

FOX News reported that this confrontation highlights political tensions surrounding gender identity today. The clash is part of wider debates on laws affecting transgender athletes across the nation.

TRUMP’S Bold Claim: ‘Above The LAW’ Post Stirs Legal Fears

16 February 2025 — Former President Donald Trump recently stirred controversy with a post on Truth Social, suggesting he is “above the law.” This comes as he faces ongoing legal battles. Trump’s words imply that actions taken to “save the country” should be free from legal scrutiny.

Legal experts warn this mixes lawful governance with authoritarianism. Trump’s message might encourage supporters to justify unlawful acts for the “greater good.” Such ideas could create a dangerous sense of impunity among leaders.

Critics argue this undermines democratic values and legal standards, potentially harming the integrity of our legal system. The trend seems politically driven, aiming to excuse illegal behavior for political goals.

For more insights into Trump’s statements and their implications, visit our full article online at (https://substack.com/home/post/p-157208710).

TRUMP FIGHTS Back: Legal Showdown Over Policies Ignites Debate

13 February 2025 — Justice Sonia Sotomayor affirmed that court decisions “stand,” addressing concerns about President TRUMP’s acceptance of legal rulings. Liberals worry about potential defiance from the administration.

President Trump, with Elon Musk’s backing, aims to cut federal employees quickly but faces legal obstacles. The administration challenges rules that protect executive branch officials from layoffs.

Major corporate law firms have united against Trump policies, focusing on immigration and transgender rights issues. At least eight top firms represent plaintiffs in these legal battles.

The Justice Department has accused New York of favoring illegal immigrants over citizens, targeting the state’s “green light” law for driver’s licenses for undocumented individuals. Pam Bondi announced a lawsuit excluding New York City and Mayor Adams but focusing on state-level policies.

TRUMP’S Bold Move: Executive Order Ignites Controversy

11 February 2025 — President Donald Trump has signed an executive order directing federal agencies to work with a group led by Elon Musk. Announced during a ceremony in the Oval Office, this decision has sparked both support and criticism. Trump insists his actions aim to combat fraud and waste, despite opposition from federal judges.

The administration is under scrutiny for billions reported in government fraud and waste. Critics argue that Trump’s recent actions are creating a constitutional crisis by straining norms through staff changes and spending freezes. Meanwhile, the FBI has found new files on JFK’s assassination following another executive order from Trump.

Trump’s foreign policy remains contentious as he pushes forward with plans for Gaza amid meetings with Jordan’s King Abdullah II. The UK faces challenges due to Trump’s tariffs, causing turmoil within Whitehall and prompting calls for diplomatic solutions from UK officials like Peter Mandelson.

Congressional Republicans generally support Trump’s initiatives but worry about budget control being influenced by Musk’s involvement. Despite these tensions, the administration continues its agenda while facing legal challenges that could impact its long-term goals.

TRUMP, MUSK, And Vance Defy Courts: A Bold Stand For Freedom

10 February 2025 — Former President Donald TRUMP, Elon Musk, and Senator J.D. Vance are reportedly preparing to challenge court orders. Critics say Trump’s recent actions show defiance of judicial authority. This has sparked debate over the balance between executive power and judicial oversight.

Vance’s comments highlight possible tensions between court orders and executive power. The Supreme Court’s “political question doctrine” often avoids policy decisions or constitutional powers of other branches. This doctrine might shape how these challenges play out in politics.

Strategically suggesting defying court orders can serve political purposes without actual intent to do so. These tactics are common in Trump’s political career, drawing both support and criticism from different groups.

Senator Vance openly supported presidential defiance against certain court orders last year with a simple “Yup” to Politico. This stance highlights ongoing debates about the limits of executive authority in America today.

TRUMP Administration FIGHTS Back: Chicago Sanctuary Laws Under Fire

08 February 2025 — The TRUMP administration has filed a lawsuit against Chicago, challenging its sanctuary laws. This is part of a larger plan to enforce federal immigration laws more strictly across the country. The administration argues that Chicago’s policies block federal efforts to manage illegal immigration effectively.

This legal action could lead to a major battle with effects on other cities with similar sanctuary policies. It brings back national debates on immigration and the power balance between local and federal authorities. Chicago’s sanctuary laws aim to limit cooperation with federal immigration enforcement, which the Trump administration claims hinders their efforts.

In related news, a Boston judge will consider stopping Trump’s birthright citizenship order, highlighting ongoing legal conflicts over immigration policies. Critics say these measures might increase tensions between federal and local law enforcement agencies.

The lawsuit’s outcome could set precedents affecting how cities handle their sanctuary policies in relation to federal law. As discussions continue, opinions on immigration enforcement and authority are likely to become even more divided nationwide.

TRUMP’S Bold Move: Ending Canadian Trade Loophole Shakes Up Business

07 February 2025 — Canadian businesses are facing new challenges as the U.S. ends the “de minimis” rule for duty-free imports. This change, driven by former President Donald Trump’s executive order, will now impose tariffs on goods that were previously exempt due to their low value.

Sheena Russell, founder of Made with Local in Dartmouth, N.S., is worried about rising costs affecting her snack food business. With the executive order taking effect next month, companies are bracing for higher expenses and more administrative hurdles.

This development comes when businesses are already dealing with various economic pressures. The end of this loophole is expected to cause a demand shock as Canadian companies adjust to the new trade landscape.

TRUMP TAKES A Stand: Chicago Sued Over Sanctuary Laws

07 February 2025 — The TRUMP administration has filed a lawsuit against Chicago, challenging its sanctuary laws. This move is part of a larger plan to enforce federal immigration laws more strictly nationwide. The administration claims that Chicago’s policies hinder federal efforts to manage illegal immigration effectively.

This legal action is expected to spark a major battle in the courts, with possible implications for other cities with similar sanctuary policies. The lawsuit has reignited national debates on immigration and the balance of power between local and federal authorities.

As this story develops, it underscores the ongoing tension between different levels of government over immigration enforcement. The outcome could set precedents affecting how cities across America handle their sanctuary policies in relation to federal law.

TRUMP’S Bold Move: Legal Battle Over Birthright Citizenship Sparks Intense Debate

05 February 2025 — A federal judge will soon hear a lawsuit challenging former President Donald Trump’s order to end birthright citizenship. This legal fight heats up the ongoing debate over U.S. immigration policy. The case questions if it’s constitutional to change the 14th Amendment’s promise of citizenship for those born on American soil.

Civil rights groups and state attorneys general argue Trump’s order undermines basic rights and contradicts established law. They say it could scare immigrant communities, affecting millions born in the U.S. to non-citizen parents. Meanwhile, Trump officials defend the order as crucial for stopping illegal immigration and protecting national security.

The outcome may greatly affect both immigration law and upcoming elections, with candidates likely taking sides on this hot issue. As arguments unfold, a ruling could either stop or push forward Trump’s order, further igniting political tensions in 2025.

TRUMP’S FAA Shake-Up: A Shocking Move or Necessary Change?

31 January 2025 — A tragic incident in the Potomac River has put the Trump administration under scrutiny. Critics argue that President Trump’s focus on DEI might distract from urgent issues, just ten days into his presidency. A congressman quickly pointed fingers, suggesting this could be a diversion from more pressing matters.

Concerns have been raised over Trump’s delay in appointing an acting FAA administrator after the previous one resigned due to conflicts with Elon Musk. Additionally, Trump fired leaders of the TSA and Coast Guard without naming immediate replacements, sparking worries about aviation security. The Aviation Security Advisory Committee also saw members dismissed despite its long-standing role since the 1980s.

Phillip highlighted that air traffic controllers might resign and accept buyouts offered by Trump without a replacement plan in place. She described Trump’s press conference as shocking yet predictable, criticizing its timing amid ongoing grief and uncertainty about the incident’s cause.

The conversation also touched on disability hiring policies and whether Trump’s remarks shift responsibility onto individuals at the FAA. Phillip stressed that while personnel changes are within presidential rights, having replacements ready is crucial for maintaining essential operations like air traffic control.

TRUMP’S Birthright Order Sparks Legal Firestorm

28 January 2025 — Twenty-two Democrat-led states are suing President Donald Trump over his executive order on birthright citizenship. The order seeks to end automatic citizenship for children born in the U.S. to non-citizen parents. This legal action challenges the 14th Amendment, which grants citizenship to anyone born on U.S. soil.

Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Joy Campbell noted that over 150,000 children could lose their citizenship rights each year under this order. The lawsuits were filed in federal courts in Boston and Concord, New Hampshire, targeting directives against recognizing U.S. citizenship for children of undocumented or non-permanent resident mothers.

New Jersey Attorney General Matthew Platkin said this lawsuit sends a strong message defending constitutional rights against Trump’s policies. This legal battle might set a precedent affecting future interpretations of citizenship rights in America.

TRUMP’S Bold Move: Legal Battle Over Birthright Citizenship Ignites

23 January 2025 — Attorneys general from 22 states are suing President Trump to stop his executive order on birthright citizenship. The order denies U.S. citizenship to children born in the country to unauthorized immigrants. This legal fight might greatly affect Trump’s immigration plans.

New Jersey’s Attorney General, Matthew J. Platkin, labeled the executive order “extraordinary and extreme.” Leading states like California and Massachusetts are questioning the legality of Trump’s decision, aiming to protect traditional immigration practices from recent changes by his administration.

This lawsuit adds to several legal challenges Trump faces post-inauguration. State governments and civil rights groups are resisting his immigration policies. The result could influence future talks on birthright citizenship in America.

22 STATES FIGHT Trump’S Bold Birthright Citizenship Order

22 January 2025 — A group of 22 states is suing to block President Trump’s executive order ending birthright citizenship. This is part of a larger reaction to recent immigration changes. The states claim the president’s move violates constitutional rights, setting off a major legal battle.

The lawsuit involves both blue and swing states, showing bipartisan resistance to the order. Experts believe this case could go to the Supreme Court, potentially deciding birthright citizenship’s future in America. Advocacy groups cheer the states for defending rights, while Trump supporters say it’s crucial for security and reform.

A spokesperson from a key state said, “The Constitution clearly outlines citizens’ rights, and we will fight to protect these for all Americans.” Initial hearings are expected soon as legal proceedings move quickly. This case highlights ongoing tensions in U.S. immigration policy and challenges faced by Trump’s administration with controversial measures.

JANUARY 6 LAWSUIT: Defendants’ Bold $50 Billion Move Against Government

06 January 2025 — Over 100 people charged in the January 6 Capitol riot are suing the government. They’re filing a $50 billion class-action lawsuit, claiming unfair targeting and mistreatment by the FBI. The lawsuit accuses political bias behind their harsh treatment and sentencing.

As Donald Trump gears up for his potential return, talks about pardons for January 6 defendants are heating up. Trump may consider clemency for some involved in the riots. The decision is tricky due to serious charges like seditious conspiracy, even though some defendants acted non-violently.

Attorney General Merrick Garland marked four years since the Capitol attack with a statement on legal actions against over 1,500 individuals involved. He stressed the Justice Department’s commitment to law and civil rights while holding those responsible accountable for that day’s violence.

These events highlight ongoing legal and political fallout from January 6, showcasing law enforcement’s response and court proceedings tied to this significant moment in recent history.

TRUMP’S Triumph Ignites Outrage: Just Stop OIL Strikes Back

06 November 2024 — On Wednesday, Donald Trump claimed victory in the 2024 U.S. Presidential Election, winning support from over 70 million Americans. Yet, not everyone was pleased. The far-left group Just Stop Oil showed their anger by splashing bright orange paint on the U.S. Embassy in London.

Just Stop Oil slammed corporate power and fossil fuel industries, saying they control major political parties and are the real winners of the election. They called Trump a “fake populist,” claiming he ignores what they see as vital — stopping oil and gas drilling. The group urged regular people to act since they believe no leaders will make needed changes.

Activist Joseph Aggarwal was detained by police after joining the protest. He voiced concerns about a lack of true democracy across Western nations, arguing voters get similar policies no matter which party wins, worsening living conditions and climate issues. Aggarwal accused Trump of using public frustration to help billionaires while ignoring urgent environmental problems.

TRUMP FIGHTS Back: Lawyers Demand End to GAG Order in New York Case

05 June 2024 — Donald Trump’s legal team is requesting the removal of a gag order that prevents him from commenting on witnesses, jurors, and others involved in his criminal case. His lawyers argue that the restrictions on Trump’s First Amendment rights are no longer justified now that the trial has concluded.

Trump’s attorneys, Todd Blanche and Emil Bove, emphasized the need for “unrestrained campaign advocacy,” especially after President Joe Biden’s public comments about the verdict. They also pointed out ongoing criticism from Michael Cohen and Stormy Daniels as reasons to lift the gag order.

The Manhattan district attorney’s office declined to comment on this request. Judge Juan M. Merchan initially issued the gag order before the trial started due to concerns about Trump attacking those involved in his cases.

Merchan later expanded it to include comments about his own family after Trump targeted his daughter online. While remarks about Merchan and District Attorney Alvin Bragg are permitted, statements regarding court staff and Bragg’s prosecution team remain prohibited under the current gag order.

SEXUAL ABUSE Lawsuit Tangles Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs and Record Label

02 April 2024 — Attorneys for the record label involved in a lawsuit, which accuses Sean “Diddy” Combs of sexual abuse, have asked a federal judge to promptly dismiss their clients. Donald Zakarin, the lawyer representing UMG Recordings and its Motown Records division, has described Rodney Jones’ inclusion of the recording giant in the lawsuit as an attempt “to fit a square peg into a round hole”.

Zakarin is working to separate Combs from the label amidst scrutiny from Homeland Security Investigations. He has requested that allegations against the label and its executives, including CEO Lucian Grainge, be dismissed.

Last month, Jones’ attorney Tyrone Blackburn amended the lawsuit and intends to file another revised complaint with additional changes. The record company had previously sought dismissal while withdrawing allegations involving itself and its executives.

Recent filings contain two sworn statements from record executives that contradict Jones’ account of events. The music giant also refuted any ownership stake in Combs’ Love Records label where Jones worked for approximately one year.

TRUMP’S FIGHT: The Fourteenth Amendment Takes Center Stage in Ballot Battle

03 November 2023 — A brewing legal battle is placing the spotlight on the Fourteenth Amendment’s “Insurrection Clause”. Plaintiffs argue that President Trump’s actions on January 6, 2021, should bar him from appearing on future ballots.

This legal challenge is not unique to one state. Similar cases are popping up across the country, including Colorado. Here, Judge Sarah Wallace, an appointee of Democrat Governor Jared Polis, presides over the case. There is a possibility that this issue may escalate to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Trump’s defense team counters by asserting that this amendment doesn’t extend to presidents. They highlight that while it mentions Senators and Representatives among others, it does not explicitly include presidents. The presidential oath has its own separate provision in the Constitution.