THREAD: supreme court grants broad immunity

FEDERAL JUDGE Stands Firm: Social Security Agency’s Future in Jeopardy

22 March 2025 — A federal judge has pushed back against Leland Dudek, the acting head of the Social Security Administration (SSA), over his threat to close the agency. Dudek argued that a ruling blocking Elon Musk’s cost-cutting team from accessing sensitive taxpayer data could apply broadly to all employees. He suggested this might require blocking nearly all SSA employees from computer systems access.

Dudek first made his closure threat during an interview with Bloomberg News on Thursday night, sparking concerns about potential disruptions in social security services. In a Friday interview with The Washington Post, he criticized the judge’s decision as overly broad and warned of its implications for agency operations.

This legal standoff highlights ongoing tensions between government agencies and private sector influences under Musk’s leadership. The situation raises questions about how far private interests can go in influencing public institutions without compromising essential services for citizens.

IDAHO Judge’s BOLD Move: Kohberger Case Secrets Exposed

05 March 2025 — An IDAHO judge has limited the use of sealed documents in the high-profile case involving Bryan Kohberger, accused of murdering four University of Idaho students. Judge Steven Hippler criticized both defense and prosecution for overusing sealed filings, stating that entire documents were unnecessarily hidden from public view. He noted much of the information was already public or not sensitive.

Judge Hippler will still allow certain information to be redacted, like witness names and victim family details. Documents can also be sealed if they meet criteria under Idaho Court Administrative Rule 32. This rule governs exemptions from public disclosure, ensuring transparency while protecting sensitive data when justified.

The judge urged both parties to adopt less restrictive methods to protect confidential information. He suggested using initials or releasing redacted versions instead of sealing entire documents. This move aims to balance transparency with privacy in a case that has drawn significant public attention.

TRUMP FIGHTS Back: Legal Showdown Over Policies Ignites Debate

13 February 2025 — Justice Sonia Sotomayor affirmed that court decisions “stand,” addressing concerns about President TRUMP’s acceptance of legal rulings. Liberals worry about potential defiance from the administration.

President Trump, with Elon Musk’s backing, aims to cut federal employees quickly but faces legal obstacles. The administration challenges rules that protect executive branch officials from layoffs.

Major corporate law firms have united against Trump policies, focusing on immigration and transgender rights issues. At least eight top firms represent plaintiffs in these legal battles.

The Justice Department has accused New York of favoring illegal immigrants over citizens, targeting the state’s “green light” law for driver’s licenses for undocumented individuals. Pam Bondi announced a lawsuit excluding New York City and Mayor Adams but focusing on state-level policies.

ARIZONA ELECTORS Celebrate Legal Triumph

11 February 2025 — Arizona’s so-called fake electors scored a major legal win in their fight to dismiss a criminal case against them. The case, led by Democratic Attorney General Kris Mayes, was challenged under an Arizona law that prevents politically motivated prosecutions. The electors argued the prosecution violated Arizona’s anti-SLAPP law, claiming it aimed to retaliate against their constitutional rights.

CRYPTO HACKS SURGE AS ILLEGAL DEALS FALL

The TRM Labs 2025 Crypto Crime Report shows a drop in illegal crypto transactions but a rise in hacks and misuse by bad actors. This trend underscores ongoing security worries in the crypto world. Legal experts are advised to stay alert as these cyber threats continue to change and grow.

WOMAN CHARGED WITH CHILD ENDANGERMENT IN OXFORD

An Oxford woman is charged with leaving three kids alone in a car while she drank nearby. Raleigh police found the children safe after responding around 12:45 a.m. This incident raises serious questions about child safety and potential legal consequences for negligence.

Ocean City Elementary School went into lockdown due to an unspecified threat, which was later deemed unverified, allowing normal activities to resume safely for students and staff alike.

TRUMP, MUSK, And Vance Defy Courts: A Bold Stand For Freedom

10 February 2025 — Former President Donald TRUMP, Elon Musk, and Senator J.D. Vance are reportedly preparing to challenge court orders. Critics say Trump’s recent actions show defiance of judicial authority. This has sparked debate over the balance between executive power and judicial oversight.

Vance’s comments highlight possible tensions between court orders and executive power. The Supreme Court’s “political question doctrine” often avoids policy decisions or constitutional powers of other branches. This doctrine might shape how these challenges play out in politics.

Strategically suggesting defying court orders can serve political purposes without actual intent to do so. These tactics are common in Trump’s political career, drawing both support and criticism from different groups.

Senator Vance openly supported presidential defiance against certain court orders last year with a simple “Yup” to Politico. This stance highlights ongoing debates about the limits of executive authority in America today.

TRUMP’S Bold Move: Legal Battle Over Birthright Citizenship Sparks Intense Debate

05 February 2025 — A federal judge will soon hear a lawsuit challenging former President Donald Trump’s order to end birthright citizenship. This legal fight heats up the ongoing debate over U.S. immigration policy. The case questions if it’s constitutional to change the 14th Amendment’s promise of citizenship for those born on American soil.

Civil rights groups and state attorneys general argue Trump’s order undermines basic rights and contradicts established law. They say it could scare immigrant communities, affecting millions born in the U.S. to non-citizen parents. Meanwhile, Trump officials defend the order as crucial for stopping illegal immigration and protecting national security.

The outcome may greatly affect both immigration law and upcoming elections, with candidates likely taking sides on this hot issue. As arguments unfold, a ruling could either stop or push forward Trump’s order, further igniting political tensions in 2025.

TRUMP’S Bold Move: Legal Battle Over Birthright Citizenship Ignites

23 January 2025 — Attorneys general from 22 states are suing President Trump to stop his executive order on birthright citizenship. The order denies U.S. citizenship to children born in the country to unauthorized immigrants. This legal fight might greatly affect Trump’s immigration plans.

New Jersey’s Attorney General, Matthew J. Platkin, labeled the executive order “extraordinary and extreme.” Leading states like California and Massachusetts are questioning the legality of Trump’s decision, aiming to protect traditional immigration practices from recent changes by his administration.

This lawsuit adds to several legal challenges Trump faces post-inauguration. State governments and civil rights groups are resisting his immigration policies. The result could influence future talks on birthright citizenship in America.

22 STATES FIGHT Trump’S Bold Birthright Citizenship Order

22 January 2025 — A group of 22 states is suing to block President Trump’s executive order ending birthright citizenship. This is part of a larger reaction to recent immigration changes. The states claim the president’s move violates constitutional rights, setting off a major legal battle.

The lawsuit involves both blue and swing states, showing bipartisan resistance to the order. Experts believe this case could go to the Supreme Court, potentially deciding birthright citizenship’s future in America. Advocacy groups cheer the states for defending rights, while Trump supporters say it’s crucial for security and reform.

A spokesperson from a key state said, “The Constitution clearly outlines citizens’ rights, and we will fight to protect these for all Americans.” Initial hearings are expected soon as legal proceedings move quickly. This case highlights ongoing tensions in U.S. immigration policy and challenges faced by Trump’s administration with controversial measures.

TRUMP’S Bold Clemency Stirs Fierce Debate

22 January 2025 — Former Proud Boys leader Enrique Tarrio and Oath Keepers founder Stewart Rhodes are now free. President Trump issued a sweeping CLEMENCY order, erasing their sentences for seditious conspiracy tied to the January 6 Capitol incident.

This decision has sparked intense debate over political extremism and accountability in the U.S. Critics say such pardons could weaken legal responses to political violence. Supporters argue it corrects perceived injustices against these individuals in the judicial process.

Presidential pardons are under close watch amid ongoing talks about extremism in American politics. Trump’s move raises questions about balancing justice with executive power in politically charged cases.

BIDEN’S Shocking Pardons: A Bold Move Against Trump’s Potential Retaliation

21 January 2025 — President Biden has issued preemptive pardons for several critics of President-elect Donald Trump and members of his own family. This bold move aims to shield them from potential backlash by the incoming administration. Biden described the situation as unique, citing relentless partisan attacks against his family.

He stressed that these pardons are crucial to stop baseless investigations. According to Biden, such actions threaten the safety and security of those targeted. The decision highlights growing tensions between the outgoing and incoming administrations.

Critics argue this sets a troubling precedent for future leaders. They claim it could weaken accountability and encourage political gamesmanship through pardons. Supporters see it as a necessary step to protect individuals from politically motivated probes.

BIDEN’S Controversial Pardons Spark Outrage: What’s Next for America?

21 January 2025 — The Supreme Court case Ex parte Garland confirmed that a president’s pardon power is nearly limitless, except in impeachment cases. This allows pardons before, during, or after legal proceedings. President Biden recently used this power to issue preemptive pardons to Dr. Anthony Fauci and members of the January 6th committee.

President Trump has also made extensive use of his pardon authority, promising clemency for those involved in the January 6 Capitol riots. He has pardoned over 1,000 individuals and commuted sentences for leaders of groups like the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers. These actions have stirred debate about justice and accountability after the Capitol events.

In another bold move affecting national policy, Trump announced plans to impose tariffs up to 25% on imports from Mexico and Canada by February 1st. This decision is part of his strategy to tackle illegal immigration and fentanyl trafficking into the U.S., emphasizing ongoing concerns about border security and trade relations with neighboring countries.

SCOTUS DECISION Rocks TikTok: What It Means for America

18 January 2025 — The U.S. Supreme Court has upheld the TikTok divest-or-ban law, dismissing claims of First Amendment violations. This decision requires ByteDance to sell its U.S. stake in TikTok by January 19 or face a nationwide ban. The ruling could change the social media landscape and has ignited debates on national security and data privacy concerns.

Legal experts are now exploring how this decision will affect freedom of expression for users. The ruling raises questions about balancing national security with constitutional rights, a topic that remains contentious among stakeholders.

Concerns are growing over how this could impact American users and businesses that rely on TikTok for communication and marketing purposes. As discussions continue, many eagerly await ByteDance’s next move in response to this landmark Supreme Court decision.

SUPREME COURT’S Bold Move: TikTok BAN to Stand in the USA

18 January 2025 — The Supreme Court has unanimously upheld a federal law banning TikTok unless its China-based parent company sells it. This decision will take effect on Sunday. TikTok’s CEO expressed gratitude towards President-elect Donald Trump for his efforts to keep the app available in the U.S.

ISRAEL’s BRAVE CEASEFIRE: Hostage DEAL with Hamas APPROVED

Israel’s Cabinet has approved a ceasefire and hostage exchange deal with Hamas, set to begin on Sunday. The agreement includes releasing Israeli hostages in exchange for Palestinian prisoners, starting with three women hostages. Additionally, Egypt will facilitate the entry of 600 aid lorries per day during the ceasefire period.

CALIFORNIA RECOVERS: Evacuation ORDERS LIFTED After Battery Plant FIRE

Authorities have lifted evacuation orders following a fire at Vistra Power Plant in Moss Landing, California. The incident forced evacuations and road closures in Monterey County on Thursday, but some roads remain closed as safety assessments continue.

A gunman shot dead two judges in Tehran, raising immediate concerns about judicial safety in Iran’s capital city. The attack highlights vulnerabilities faced by judges involved in politically sensitive cases within the country’s judicial system

SUPREME COURT’S Bold Move to Protect America from China-Owned Apps

17 January 2025 — The U.S. SUPREME COURT has upheld a law allowing the government to ban TikTok unless it’s sold by its Chinese parent company. This decision addresses concerns over data privacy and national security linked to the popular app. Millions of American users are affected as lawmakers push for tougher rules on foreign-owned social media platforms.

The law emerged from fears that China could access sensitive personal data of American users through TikTok. Supporters see this ruling as a win for privacy and security, while critics worry about job losses and restricted free speech. The decision aligns with increased scrutiny on foreign tech companies in the U.S.

TikTok has been urged to consider selling or restructuring to ease these concerns, which could impact other tech firms with foreign connections. This ruling may lead to big changes in how tech companies are owned and operate under U.S. laws, sparking talks about future compliance strategies within the industry.

JANUARY 6 LAWSUIT: Defendants’ Bold $50 Billion Move Against Government

06 January 2025 — Over 100 people charged in the January 6 Capitol riot are suing the government. They’re filing a $50 billion class-action lawsuit, claiming unfair targeting and mistreatment by the FBI. The lawsuit accuses political bias behind their harsh treatment and sentencing.

As Donald Trump gears up for his potential return, talks about pardons for January 6 defendants are heating up. Trump may consider clemency for some involved in the riots. The decision is tricky due to serious charges like seditious conspiracy, even though some defendants acted non-violently.

Attorney General Merrick Garland marked four years since the Capitol attack with a statement on legal actions against over 1,500 individuals involved. He stressed the Justice Department’s commitment to law and civil rights while holding those responsible accountable for that day’s violence.

These events highlight ongoing legal and political fallout from January 6, showcasing law enforcement’s response and court proceedings tied to this significant moment in recent history.

SUPREME COURT Shocker: Emergency Abortions Allowed in Idaho

26 June 2024 — The Supreme Court is set to permit emergency abortions in Idaho when a pregnant patient’s health is at serious risk. A draft opinion briefly posted on the court’s website indicates a 6-3 vote to reinstate a lower court order allowing such procedures. Conservative Justices Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch dissented.

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson noted that this decision does not resolve the core issues of Idaho’s strict abortion ban. She emphasized that today’s ruling is merely a delay, not a victory for pregnant patients in Idaho. The case will continue at the 9th U.S. Circuit Court and may return to the Supreme Court later.

The Supreme Court acknowledged an inadvertent posting of the document and stated that an official opinion would be issued “in due course.” This development leaves many key questions unanswered, prolonging uncertainty around Idaho’s abortion laws.

IDAHO Supreme Court REJECTS Appeal in Shocking Student Murder Case

13 March 2024 — The Idaho Supreme Court dismissed the pretrial appeal of Bryan Kohberger on Tuesday. Kohberger’s public defenders had argued that his indictment on four counts of first-degree murder and one count of burglary was improperly handled by prosecutors.

The grand jury was guided to indict if they found guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, which is a more stringent criterion than probable cause. The reasoning behind the Idaho Supreme Court’s dismissal of the appeal was not disclosed.

Kohberger, a 29-year-old Ph.D. student hailing from Pennsylvania, stands accused of committing an unspeakable crime in Moscow, Idaho. He allegedly infiltrated an off-campus residence and brutally murdered four University of Idaho students in November 2022. His bid to stall proceedings by challenging the judge’s refusal to discard the indictment proved futile

As Kohberger awaits trial for his purported heinous acts, this case continues to evolve. This latest ruling signifies another stride towards justice for the victims.

Supreme Court: Last RESORT for CUNY Professors Suing Union Over Alleged Antisemitism

22 January 2024 — A collective of professors from the City University of New York (CUNY) is taking legal action against a teachers union, Professional Staff Congress/CUNY (PSC). They accuse PSC of fostering antisemitism. The professors see their ultimate hope in the Supreme Court’s intervention. Despite their resignation from the union due to its perceived anti-Jewish bias, state law obliges them to maintain an association with it.

The dispute ignited when PSC endorsed a “Resolution in Support of the Palestinian People” in 2021. This resolution was interpreted as antisemitic and anti-Israel by six professors, prompting their withdrawal from the union. Nonetheless, New York State law dictates that these same professors must be represented by this union in collective bargaining discussions.

Avraham Goldstein, a mathematics professor and one of the six dissenters, voiced his distress over being compelled to align with a union he believes issues antisemitic statements without his approval.

This legal battle follows on from a significant Supreme Court ruling in Janus v. AFSCME (2018). The court decided that public employees who are not members can’t be forced to pay fees to a union as it infringes upon their First Amendment rights.

UK Judges DISMISS Security Threats, HAND Citizenship to Isis Propagandist

01 January 2024 — British judges have recently overlooked concerns raised by the Home Office regarding a Sudanese migrant, referred to as “S3”. This individual entered the UK illegally in 2005 and again in 2018. Despite having his British passport revoked due to active dissemination of ISIS propaganda, he has now been granted UK citizenship and permanent anonymity.

S3’s legal representation argued that his deportation would infringe upon his human rights. They cited potential detention and torture risks in Sudan as reasons for him to remain in the UK. This argument swayed the justices, even though S3 has made multiple trips back to Sudan without facing any form of persecution. During one such visit in December 2016, he allegedly used social media platforms to spread ISIS propaganda.

The government presented a case suggesting that S3 is a threat to national security. MI5 claimed that he showed unwavering commitment towards extremist ideologies propagated by ISIS and could potentially influence others towards radicalization. However, his lawyers successfully invoked provisions from the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) preventing his deportation.

Prominent Brexiteers like Nigel Farage believe that Rishi Sunak’s government must withdraw from ECHR for regaining control over Britain’s borders. The ECHR has been previously used as a shield against deportation for at least 53 convicted terrorists.

Biden’s BOLD Defiance of Supreme Court: The TRUTH Behind Student Loan Forgiveness Numbers

21 December 2023 — President Joe Biden made a bold claim on Wednesday, boasting about his defiance of the Supreme Court’s ruling on student loans. During a speech in Milwaukee, he asserted that he had wiped out the debt for 136 million people. This statement came despite the Supreme Court rejecting his $400 billion loan forgiveness plan back in June.

However, this claim not only challenges the separation of powers but also holds no water factually. As per data from early December, only $132 billion in student loan debt has been cleared for a mere 3.6 million borrowers. This implies that Biden exaggerated the number of beneficiaries by an astounding figure – approximately 133 million.

Biden’s misrepresentation sparks concerns about his administration’s transparency and its respect for judicial decisions. His remarks further fuel ongoing discussions around student loan forgiveness and its ripple effects on economic aspects like homeownership and entrepreneurship.

“This incident underscores the need for accurate information from our leaders and respectful adherence to judicial rulings. It also highlights how critical it is to have open dialogues about policy impacts, particularly when they affect millions of Americans’ financial futures.”