THREAD: trump bold claim above law

TRUMP’S Fiery Blame: Past Presidents’ ‘Stupid’ China Trade Deals Exposed

10 April 2025 — During an Oval Office event, TRUMP criticized former presidents for mishandling trade relations with CHINA. He stated, “I blame the people sitting … right behind this desk or another desk — you get your choice of seven.” Trump accused them of being “stupid, incompetent, or not having courage.”

Trump traced the trade imbalance to the World Trade Organization (WTO), claiming it was controlled by China. He argued that past leaders allowed unfair agreements due to incompetence or corruption. “They were stupid people, maybe corrupt,” he remarked.

He emphasized that other countries also exploited the U.S., citing Japan as an example. Trump said he reviewed past trade deals during his first term and found them unfavorable. “How could anybody agree to this stuff?” he questioned, blaming previous administrations for allowing such deals.

Trump’s comments reflect his ongoing criticism of predecessors and highlight his focus on renegotiating international agreements to benefit America more fairly. His remarks resonate with those who prioritize strong leadership in international trade matters.

TRUMP’S BOLD Defense of US Trade Tariffs Stirs Controversy

07 April 2025 — Former President Donald Trump is firmly defending the sweeping tariffs from his time in office, despite facing backlash. He argues these tariffs are vital to protect American jobs and industries, saying, “sometimes you have to take medicine.”

Critics warn these tariffs might raise consumer prices and spark retaliation from countries like China. Analysts suggest Trump’s stance could energize his base in key battleground states where manufacturing jobs matter most.

Trump supporters believe the tariffs will revive American manufacturing, even as protests against them grow in various cities. Demonstrators claim the economic impact will hit the working class hardest.

The tariff debate becomes crucial ahead of elections, shaping voter opinions and party strategies. Republican leaders are split on Trump’s policies, with some worried about possible economic fallout.

TRUMP’S Bold Trade Move Shakes Global Markets

03 April 2025 — Former President Donald Trump has signed orders for “reciprocal tariffs” aimed at countries with unfair trade practices. This plan is to protect American jobs by taxing goods from nations harming the U.S. economy. It’s a major shift in U.S. trade policy, affecting many imports.

Trump calls these tariffs vital to balance foreign advantages over American manufacturers, showing his focus on American workers and industries. This aligns with his re-election strategy, emphasizing economic nationalism as a key point. Supporters see it as reclaiming economic control, while critics warn of possible retaliatory tariffs and tense international relations.

Economists are split on the effects, worried about complicating U.S. trade further and raising consumer costs if other countries retaliate. The announcement has sparked mixed reactions across political lines, showing different views on its economic impact potential.

As Trump boosts his campaign efforts, this sweeping tariff policy will be watched closely by both domestic and international stakeholders for its effects on global trade dynamics and the future direction of the U.S economy’s path forward.

TRUMP’S Bold Stance on Auto Price Hikes and Global Diplomacy Revealed

31 March 2025 — President Donald Trump recently declared he “couldn’t care less” if foreign automakers hike prices due to his auto tariffs. This bold move shows his commitment to putting American interests first, despite foreign economic pressures. Trump also confirmed he won’t fire anyone involved in the Signal group chat controversy.

Internationally, Iran has rejected direct nuclear talks with Trump but is open to indirect discussions. The President has warned of military action if Tehran doesn’t agree to a nuclear deal with Washington, highlighting his strong approach to national security and diplomacy.

Trump criticized Russian President Vladimir Putin and warned of secondary tariffs on nations buying oil from Russia amid Ukraine tensions. These potential tariffs are part of Trump’s broader strategy as he nears an April 2 deadline for major tariff actions against adversaries while staying open to negotiation deals.

Domestically, Republicans face challenges as Democrats aim for gains in Florida’s Sixth District despite Trump’s past success there. Meanwhile, Trump withdrew Congresswoman Elise Stefanik’s nomination for U.N. ambassador amidst a slim GOP House majority and upcoming special elections, underscoring internal party dynamics and strategic shifts before future political battles.

TRUMP’S GOLD Card Plan: Economic Boost or Risky Gamble?

20 March 2025 — During a chat with Laura Ingraham, former President Donald Trump tackled worries about his gold card plan. He assured that any unsavory individuals would be screened and removed if needed. Trump stressed that those found unfit would get refunds and be sent out of the country.

Trump pointed out the economic perks of the plan, noting that people who can pay the $5 million fee are likely to create jobs. He believes these immigrants will boost the economy by generating jobs and encouraging business growth.

Trump also mentioned that companies might buy these gold cards to hire top graduates from America’s best schools. This strategy aims to attract skilled professionals who can drive innovation and competitiveness in various fields.

TRUMP’S Bold Promise: "Expose" Justice Department Foes

15 March 2025 — President Donald TRUMP visited the Justice Department, using the platform to criticize ongoing criminal investigations against him. He vowed to investigate and jail his political enemies, framing his speech as a “law-and-order” initiative. This marked an unprecedented move, as no president has delivered such a politically charged address at the Justice Department since 2014.

Trump expressed confidence in exposing alleged misconduct by adversaries within politics. His speech signals a significant moment in U.S. politics, intertwining law enforcement with political strategy. The audience was mainly composed of Trump supporters, including figures previously scrutinized by the Justice Department.

The event has sparked both support and criticism across the nation, reflecting Trump’s polarizing influence on American politics. His approach could further deepen divisions within an already fractured political landscape. As Trump continues to challenge traditional presidential norms, his actions may have lasting implications for future administrations and their relationship with law enforcement agencies.

TRUMP’S Bold Claim: ‘Above The LAW’ Post Stirs Legal Fears

16 February 2025 — Former President Donald Trump recently stirred controversy with a post on Truth Social, suggesting he is “above the law.” This comes as he faces ongoing legal battles. Trump’s words imply that actions taken to “save the country” should be free from legal scrutiny.

Legal experts warn this mixes lawful governance with authoritarianism. Trump’s message might encourage supporters to justify unlawful acts for the “greater good.” Such ideas could create a dangerous sense of impunity among leaders.

Critics argue this undermines democratic values and legal standards, potentially harming the integrity of our legal system. The trend seems politically driven, aiming to excuse illegal behavior for political goals.

For more insights into Trump’s statements and their implications, visit our full article online at (https://substack.com/home/post/p-157208710).

TRUMP FIGHTS Back: Legal Showdown Over Policies Ignites Debate

13 February 2025 — Justice Sonia Sotomayor affirmed that court decisions “stand,” addressing concerns about President TRUMP’s acceptance of legal rulings. Liberals worry about potential defiance from the administration.

President Trump, with Elon Musk’s backing, aims to cut federal employees quickly but faces legal obstacles. The administration challenges rules that protect executive branch officials from layoffs.

Major corporate law firms have united against Trump policies, focusing on immigration and transgender rights issues. At least eight top firms represent plaintiffs in these legal battles.

The Justice Department has accused New York of favoring illegal immigrants over citizens, targeting the state’s “green light” law for driver’s licenses for undocumented individuals. Pam Bondi announced a lawsuit excluding New York City and Mayor Adams but focusing on state-level policies.

TRUMP’S Bold Move: Executive Order Ignites Controversy

11 February 2025 — President Donald Trump has signed an executive order directing federal agencies to work with a group led by Elon Musk. Announced during a ceremony in the Oval Office, this decision has sparked both support and criticism. Trump insists his actions aim to combat fraud and waste, despite opposition from federal judges.

The administration is under scrutiny for billions reported in government fraud and waste. Critics argue that Trump’s recent actions are creating a constitutional crisis by straining norms through staff changes and spending freezes. Meanwhile, the FBI has found new files on JFK’s assassination following another executive order from Trump.

Trump’s foreign policy remains contentious as he pushes forward with plans for Gaza amid meetings with Jordan’s King Abdullah II. The UK faces challenges due to Trump’s tariffs, causing turmoil within Whitehall and prompting calls for diplomatic solutions from UK officials like Peter Mandelson.

Congressional Republicans generally support Trump’s initiatives but worry about budget control being influenced by Musk’s involvement. Despite these tensions, the administration continues its agenda while facing legal challenges that could impact its long-term goals.

TRUMP, MUSK, And Vance Defy Courts: A Bold Stand For Freedom

10 February 2025 — Former President Donald TRUMP, Elon Musk, and Senator J.D. Vance are reportedly preparing to challenge court orders. Critics say Trump’s recent actions show defiance of judicial authority. This has sparked debate over the balance between executive power and judicial oversight.

Vance’s comments highlight possible tensions between court orders and executive power. The Supreme Court’s “political question doctrine” often avoids policy decisions or constitutional powers of other branches. This doctrine might shape how these challenges play out in politics.

Strategically suggesting defying court orders can serve political purposes without actual intent to do so. These tactics are common in Trump’s political career, drawing both support and criticism from different groups.

Senator Vance openly supported presidential defiance against certain court orders last year with a simple “Yup” to Politico. This stance highlights ongoing debates about the limits of executive authority in America today.

TRUMP’S Bold Move: Local Police Join Immigration Enforcement

09 February 2025 — The Trump administration is taking a bold step by involving local law enforcement in immigration enforcement. President Trump aims to extend federal immigration policies to the local level, intensifying efforts amid ongoing debates about reform. This initiative encourages local police departments to collaborate with federal agencies, increasing the number of officers trained in immigration protocols.

This move aligns with the administration’s broader strategy to tighten immigration controls and ensure compliance with federal laws on undocumented immigrants. Supporters argue this is crucial for national security and effective immigration management. However, critics express concerns about potential racial profiling and deteriorating trust between immigrant communities and law enforcement.

Local involvement in immigration issues could significantly affect immigrant communities, potentially making them hesitant to report crimes or interact with police due to deportation fears. As the 2026 midterm elections approach, this policy will likely influence political discussions and attract attention from advocacy groups, local governments, and voters focused on immigration issues.

The administration’s commitment to stricter enforcement is evident through these measures, which are expected to shape future policy debates and impact various stakeholders across the nation. This development underscores a pivotal moment in U.S. immigration policy under President Trump’s leadership.

TRUMP’S Bold Moves Shake UP America And The World

09 February 2025 — President TRUMP has unveiled a plan to involve local police in immigration enforcement. This reinforces his tough stance on immigration and could affect community relations, especially in areas with many immigrants. Critics say it might strain police resources and heighten tensions.

The Trump administration has labeled diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies in university research grants as “illegal.” This decision raises concerns about political meddling in academic funding. Researchers worry it could stifle diversity and innovation in academia.

A federal judge stopped Elon Musk’s team from accessing sensitive U.S. Treasury records related to his cryptocurrency ventures. The ruling underscores worries about corporate influence over government oversight. Meanwhile, TRUMP halted Biden’s classified intelligence briefings, calling it “payback,” disrupting national security norms.

Trump’s order freezing aid to South Africa responds to a land reform law criticized for potentially taking land from white farmers without compensation. His withdrawal of support for transgender minors in a Supreme Court case is drawing backlash from LGBTQ+ groups and inspiring similar actions by GOP-led states. Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau warns that Trump’s annexation comments are a national security threat, reflecting growing international tensions as Trump’s policies provoke strong reactions both at home and abroad.

TRUMP’S Bold Move: Ending Canadian Trade Loophole Shakes Up Business

07 February 2025 — Canadian businesses are facing new challenges as the U.S. ends the “de minimis” rule for duty-free imports. This change, driven by former President Donald Trump’s executive order, will now impose tariffs on goods that were previously exempt due to their low value.

Sheena Russell, founder of Made with Local in Dartmouth, N.S., is worried about rising costs affecting her snack food business. With the executive order taking effect next month, companies are bracing for higher expenses and more administrative hurdles.

This development comes when businesses are already dealing with various economic pressures. The end of this loophole is expected to cause a demand shock as Canadian companies adjust to the new trade landscape.

TRUMP TAKES A Stand: Chicago Sued Over Sanctuary Laws

07 February 2025 — The TRUMP administration has filed a lawsuit against Chicago, challenging its sanctuary laws. This move is part of a larger plan to enforce federal immigration laws more strictly nationwide. The administration claims that Chicago’s policies hinder federal efforts to manage illegal immigration effectively.

This legal action is expected to spark a major battle in the courts, with possible implications for other cities with similar sanctuary policies. The lawsuit has reignited national debates on immigration and the balance of power between local and federal authorities.

As this story develops, it underscores the ongoing tension between different levels of government over immigration enforcement. The outcome could set precedents affecting how cities across America handle their sanctuary policies in relation to federal law.

TRUMP’S Bold Move: Legal Battle Over Birthright Citizenship Sparks Intense Debate

05 February 2025 — A federal judge will soon hear a lawsuit challenging former President Donald Trump’s order to end birthright citizenship. This legal fight heats up the ongoing debate over U.S. immigration policy. The case questions if it’s constitutional to change the 14th Amendment’s promise of citizenship for those born on American soil.

Civil rights groups and state attorneys general argue Trump’s order undermines basic rights and contradicts established law. They say it could scare immigrant communities, affecting millions born in the U.S. to non-citizen parents. Meanwhile, Trump officials defend the order as crucial for stopping illegal immigration and protecting national security.

The outcome may greatly affect both immigration law and upcoming elections, with candidates likely taking sides on this hot issue. As arguments unfold, a ruling could either stop or push forward Trump’s order, further igniting political tensions in 2025.

TRUMP’S Bold Move: Legal Battle Over Birthright Citizenship Ignites

23 January 2025 — Attorneys general from 22 states are suing President Trump to stop his executive order on birthright citizenship. The order denies U.S. citizenship to children born in the country to unauthorized immigrants. This legal fight might greatly affect Trump’s immigration plans.

New Jersey’s Attorney General, Matthew J. Platkin, labeled the executive order “extraordinary and extreme.” Leading states like California and Massachusetts are questioning the legality of Trump’s decision, aiming to protect traditional immigration practices from recent changes by his administration.

This lawsuit adds to several legal challenges Trump faces post-inauguration. State governments and civil rights groups are resisting his immigration policies. The result could influence future talks on birthright citizenship in America.

22 STATES FIGHT Trump’S Bold Birthright Citizenship Order

22 January 2025 — A group of 22 states is suing to block President Trump’s executive order ending birthright citizenship. This is part of a larger reaction to recent immigration changes. The states claim the president’s move violates constitutional rights, setting off a major legal battle.

The lawsuit involves both blue and swing states, showing bipartisan resistance to the order. Experts believe this case could go to the Supreme Court, potentially deciding birthright citizenship’s future in America. Advocacy groups cheer the states for defending rights, while Trump supporters say it’s crucial for security and reform.

A spokesperson from a key state said, “The Constitution clearly outlines citizens’ rights, and we will fight to protect these for all Americans.” Initial hearings are expected soon as legal proceedings move quickly. This case highlights ongoing tensions in U.S. immigration policy and challenges faced by Trump’s administration with controversial measures.

TRUMP’S FIGHT: The Fourteenth Amendment Takes Center Stage in Ballot Battle

03 November 2023 — A brewing legal battle is placing the spotlight on the Fourteenth Amendment’s “Insurrection Clause”. Plaintiffs argue that President Trump’s actions on January 6, 2021, should bar him from appearing on future ballots.

This legal challenge is not unique to one state. Similar cases are popping up across the country, including Colorado. Here, Judge Sarah Wallace, an appointee of Democrat Governor Jared Polis, presides over the case. There is a possibility that this issue may escalate to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Trump’s defense team counters by asserting that this amendment doesn’t extend to presidents. They highlight that while it mentions Senators and Representatives among others, it does not explicitly include presidents. The presidential oath has its own separate provision in the Constitution.